Addy Osmani 等谈 Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查
Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang
Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 提出，"人类是否读过代码"并非判断变更风险的准确标准，更该问的是"这次改动可能出什么问题、该由哪种检查（自动或人工）来抓"。他们称 Claude Code 团队的审查已从 PR 末尾的关卡变为持续进行，多数改动在交给人看之前已被 Claude 至少审查并修复过一次。
16th October 2026
We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"
Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.
Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.
— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review
来源：Simon Willison · simonwillison.net